Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-25 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 is better than OPPO Find X, with an 85 score against 72.2. Even though the Apple iPhone 8 is older than the OPPO Find X, it's design is incredibly thinner and much lighter. IPhone 8 has a screen that's very similar to the OPPO Find X one, although the iPhone 8 has a lot lower 750 x 1334 resolution, a way smaller screen and a just a bit lower display density.
The iPhone 8 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Find X, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and less and slower cpu cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processor. IPhone 8 and OPPO Find X both have very similar cameras, because although the iPhone 8 has a back facing camera with a lot worse 12 MP resolution, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a smaller camera sensor capturing lower quality photos, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better images and videos in low-light environments.
IPhone 8 and OPPO Find X count with incredibly similar memory capacity to install games and applications, they have exactly the same internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X has a much longer battery performance than iPhone 8, because it has a 105% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.