Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-25 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is much better than the OPPO Find X's score of 72.2. Although the Google Pixel 2 is older than the OPPO Find X, it's design is way lighter and somewhat thinner. Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit better screen than OPPO Find X, because although it has a really smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit better screen pixels density.
The OPPO Find X features a bit faster processor than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X also has more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X has much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The OPPO Find X shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting images and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and a same size sensor, the OPPO Find X also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back.
The OPPO Find X has a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 3730mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.