Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-07-25 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is much better than OPPO Find X's overall score of 72.2. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version while OPPO Find X has Android 8.1 Oreo. The LG V50 ThinQ is a newer phone, and it is also a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the OPPO Find X.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a CPU that's just as good as the OPPO Find X one, and although the LG V50 ThinQ has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. LG V50 ThinQ features a little sharper display than OPPO Find X, and although they both have a same size screen, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and more pixels per display inch.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit better battery performance than OPPO Find X, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X, because although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a worse video quality, and they both have the same sensor size, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with a much bigger camera aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.