Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android |
| 2018-07-25 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 403 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is better than the OPPO Find X, with a general score of 84.7 against 72.2. The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a incredibly newer and a bit thinner device than the OPPO Find X, although it's also a bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android OS, and OPPO Find X has Android 8.1 Oreo OS.
The OPPO Find X features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X also has a greater amount of RAM. OPPO Find X has a brighter display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel number per inch of display and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Galaxy A32 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than OPPO Find X, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 also has a camera with a way higher resolution and a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light situations.
The OPPO Find X has just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has better battery duration than OPPO Find X, because it has a 34% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.