Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-07-25 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is better than the OPPO Find X, with an 81 score against 72.2. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has older 6.0 Marshmallow version while OPPO Find X has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is an older and a bit heavier phone than the OPPO Find X, but Samsung managed to build it incredibly thinner anyway.
The OPPO Find X features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little larger display, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite higher pixel number per inch in the screen. OPPO Find X has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X also has 2 GB more RAM.
The OPPO Find X counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The OPPO Find X takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting images and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have a 16 MP resolution camera, the OPPO Find X also counts with a way better (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has just a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Find X, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3730mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.