Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-25 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.17 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3730mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has a score of 87.1, which is a lot better than the OPPO Find X's global score of 72.2. Galaxy Note9's body is a little thinner but a bit heavier than the OPPO Find X, and they were released with only a couple of months difference. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a little bit better display than OPPO Find X, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and more pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy Note9 features just a bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. The OPPO Find X and the Galaxy Note9 both have incredibly similar processing units, and although the Galaxy Note9 has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a little longer battery duration than OPPO Find X, because it has a 7% more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 shoots slightly better photos and videos than OPPO Find X, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a back-facing camera with much less MP, it also counts with a bigger sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality and a way bigger aperture for better low-light captures and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.