Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P has an overall score of 80.3, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's global score of 74.4. Although Google Nexus 6P is older than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, it's construction is a little thinner and just a little lighter. Google Nexus 6P has a display that's very similar to the OPPO Find X2 Lite one, because although the Google Nexus 6P has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has 5 GB more RAM memory. Google Nexus 6P has as much memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as the OPPO Find X2 Lite one, both have the same internal memory capacity.
OPPO Find X2 Lite shoots much better photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light situations, a lot better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
OPPO Find X2 Lite features a bit longer battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 4025mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.