Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, with a score of 83.7 against 74.4. Even being the best we are comparing, LG V50 ThinQ's body is older, a bit thicker and a little heavier than OPPO Find X2 Lite. Both devices in our current comparison come with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a slightly better screen than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a better pixel count per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit faster CPU than OPPO Find X2 Lite, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X2 Lite and the LG V50 ThinQ have extremely similar batteries performance, although the LG V50 ThinQ has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4025mAh.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite takes better videos and photos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a back camera with lot more MP and a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.