Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a global score of 76.4, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite's 74.4 global score. The Motorola Droid Turbo is an extremely older and notably thicker device than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, but Motorola could make it a bit lighter anyway. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but Motorola Droid Turbo has 4.4.4 version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10 version, providing some extra features and enhanced performance.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a much better looking display than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity per inch in the display and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. OPPO Find X2 Lite features a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 96 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features just a little better hardware performance than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics co-processor. OPPO Find X2 Lite features just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 3% greater battery capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a superior camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has better video frame rates, a camera with much more mega-pixels and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.