Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a score of 77.9, which is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's general score of 74.4. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola DROID Turbo has 4.4.4 version and OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10, so it provides the user some nice extra features and some performance improvements. Even though the Motorola DROID Turbo is incredibly older and extremely thicker than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, it's body is still just a little bit lighter.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a little bit better hardware performance than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has less processing cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Motorola DROID Turbo has a better looking display than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
OPPO Find X2 Lite captures better videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a camera with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution, higher 30 frames per second video frame rate and a larger aperture. The OPPO Find X2 Lite has much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal storage.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a little longer battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 3 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.