Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, with a 79.7 score against 74.4. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison review, Moto G Stylus's design is just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker than OPPO Find X2 Lite. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Moto G Stylus has the newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a bit better screen than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a little bit greater screen pixel density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a bit better processing unit than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Moto G Stylus has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Moto G Stylus also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Moto G Stylus and OPPO Find X2 Lite both feature extremely similar battery performance, although the Moto G Stylus has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4025mAh.
OPPO Find X2 Lite captures just a bit better photos and videos than Moto G Stylus. Both of them have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same sensor size, a 48 megapixels back-facing camera, a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.