Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-05-21 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 411 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is much better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's 74.4 score. The Galaxy A32 is a thicker and somewhat heavier phone than OPPO Find X2 Lite. The Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10 OS. OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a much better display pixel density. OPPO Find X2 Lite takes a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same video frame rates and the same resolution back camera, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography.
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A32 counts with better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has a 24 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.