Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-05-21 | 2018-08-27 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A8 Star has a score of 82.1, which is better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's global score of 74.4. The Galaxy A8 Star is an older and just a little bit heavier phone than the OPPO Find X2 Lite, but Samsung could make it just a bit thinner anyway. Both devices in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A8 Star has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a little bit bigger screen and a bit higher display pixels density. The OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Lite shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a F1.7 aperture and the same video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a camera with lot more megapixels and a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A8 Star has more storage to install applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 400 GB. OPPO Find X2 Lite counts with a little longer battery duration than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a 9 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.