Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31 has a general score of 86.5, which is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Lite's 74.4 score. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M31 has a more recent 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Lite has Android 10. Despite being the best we are comparing, Galaxy M31's design is a little bit heavier and thicker than the OPPO Find X2 Lite.
The OPPO Find X2 Lite features a little sharper display than Galaxy M31, and although they both have a display with the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a brighter screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a bit better screen pixel density. Galaxy M31 counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
OPPO Find X2 Lite features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy M31, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy M31 features a very superior battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4025mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X2 Lite, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also counts with a bigger sensor and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.