Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.31 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Pearl White | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than OPPO Find X2 Lite's 74.4 global score. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 body is older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the OPPO Find X2 Lite. Galaxy Note9 features just a bit better processing power than OPPO Find X2 Lite, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit more vivid display than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy Note9 also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a greater pixels density. OPPO Find X2 Lite features a better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Lite also counts with a much bigger sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Lite, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy Note9 and OPPO Find X2 Lite count with incredibly similar battery durations, although the Galaxy Note9 has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.