Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 has a global score of 85, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's score of 77.7. Although the iPhone 8 is extremely older than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, it's body is somewhat lighter and a little thinner. IPhone 8 features a bit better performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has 10 GB less RAM and a lower number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has just a bit better screen than iPhone 8, because it has a brighter screen, a lot bigger screen, a much better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit more pixels per display inch. The iPhone 8's storage for games and applications is just as good as OPPO Find X2 Neo's one, they have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a very superior battery life than iPhone 8, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity against 1821mAh. OPPO Find X2 Neo has a better camera than iPhone 8, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a larger aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments, a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality and a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.