Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, with an 83.7 score against 77.7. The LG V50 ThinQ body is older, just a little heavier and just a little bit thicker than OPPO Find X2 Neo. These phones use the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences regarding OS features.
LG V50 ThinQ features a display that is very similar to the display in OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although the LG V50 ThinQ has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution and a greater count of pixels per inch of screen. The LG V50 ThinQ has just a little better processing power than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
LG V50 ThinQ has much more storage to install applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ has a battery duration that is very similar to the battery duration in OPPO Find X2 Neo, although the LG V50 ThinQ has just 4000mAh battery size against 4025mAh.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features a superior camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.