Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-05-21 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has an overall score of 77.9, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Neo's 77.7 general score. Both devices in this review work with Android operating system, but the Motorola DROID Turbo has 4.4.4 version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10, so it gives you a couple nice extra features. Even being the best in our current comparison, the Motorola DROID Turbo body is much older, extremely thicker and just a little heavier than the OPPO Find X2 Neo.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a sharper screen than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per display inch. Motorola DROID Turbo and OPPO Find X2 Neo count with incredibly similar processing units, because although the Motorola DROID Turbo has a smaller amount of RAM and lesser cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processor.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has a much better memory to store more games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity. OPPO Find X2 Neo features a better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has better 30 fps video frame rate, a bigger aperture and a camera with a much higher resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Neo has just a bit longer battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.