Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-05-21 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, getting a 90.5 score against 77.7. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G construction is somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker than OPPO Find X2 Neo. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 OS.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a just a little better quantity of pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a slightly better storage to install applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A90 5G features a little better hardware performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy A90 5G's camera is very similar to the camera in OPPO Find X2 Neo, and although the Galaxy A90 5G has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking images and video in low light situations, they both have the same video definition, a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a same resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy A90 5G has just a bit better battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.