Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-21 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, getting an 81 score against 77.7. Both devices in our current comparison have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's body is a little bit thinner than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it's just a bit heavier and was released many years before.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bigger display, a bit better pixel quantity in each inch in the screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. OPPO Find X2 Neo features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy C9 Pro and OPPO Find X2 Neo feature really similar battery durations, although the Galaxy C9 Pro has a 1 percent smaller battery size.
OPPO Find X2 Neo captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better photography in poorly lited environments, a lot better 3840x2160 video quality and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.