Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 is better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, with an 87.1 score against 77.7. Despite being the best in this comparison review, it must be noted that it's also older, thicker and heavier. OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a little bit inferior pixel number in each inch of screen and a way lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
The Galaxy Note9 has a slightly bigger memory to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit faster CPU than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy Note9's battery lifetime is very similar to OPPO Find X2 Neo's battery performance, although the Galaxy Note9 has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4025mAh. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a much better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.