Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-21 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Moonlight Black and Starry Blue | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, with an 85.5 score against 77.7. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's construction is older, thicker and just a bit heavier than OPPO Find X2 Neo. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit better CPU than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a lot brighter display, a quite larger display, a bit greater amount of pixels per display inch and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. OPPO Find X2 Neo takes much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures, a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X2 Neo, and although they both have the same 256 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a battery performance that is just as good as the OPPO Find X2 Neo one, although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a 1% lower battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.