Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Ocean | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 519 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 has a general score of 85, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's 83.1 score. Even though Apple iPhone 8 is noticeably older than OPPO Find X2 Pro, it's body is somewhat thinner and extremely lighter. Apple iPhone 8 features a bit more powerful processing unit than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has 10 GB lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a sharper display than iPhone 8, because it has a lot larger screen, a brighter display, a much higher 1440 x 3168px resolution and a lot greater screen density. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a superior camera than iPhone 8, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a much bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a very superior memory for apps and games than iPhone 8, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much longer battery life than iPhone 8, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity against 1821mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.