Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Ocean | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 519 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro is slightly better than Moto G Stylus, having a global score of 83.1 against 79.7. The OPPO Find X2 Pro body is just a little heavier but just a little thinner than Moto G Stylus, and they were only released 1 months apart. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but OPPO Find X2 Pro has an older 10 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a greater pixels amount per inch of screen. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a superior memory for applications and games than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a much larger back camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality and better 60 fps video frame rate.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 4260mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.