Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Ocean | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 519 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has a global score of 91.8, which is better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's 83.1 overall score. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G has a newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10, so it offers some additional features. Galaxy A71 5G is a lighter and a little bit thinner phone than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, even when both were released with only a couple months difference.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a better screen density. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a bit better camera than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking lower quality videos and images, a tinier aperture and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 6 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.