Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Ocean | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 has a general score of 84.9, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's general score of 83.1. Samsung Galaxy A80's body is older, a little bit thicker and just a little heavier than the OPPO Find X2 Pro. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A80, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a better display than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have a display with the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same resolution back camera, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has better video frame rates, a larger aperture to take better low-light images and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A80, because it has more internal storage. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A80, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.