Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Ocean | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's 83.1 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G works with Android operating system, while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10 operating system. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a a little thinner and a little bit lighter cellphone than OPPO Find X2 Pro, although both of them were only released with a few months difference.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a better screen density.
OPPO Find X2 Pro takes clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with a 48 mega-pixels resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has better video frame rate, a much larger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photos and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light situations.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit superior battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 6 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.