Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-05-14 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Ocean | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, getting an 83.1 score against 81. Both devices we are comparing include Android OS (operating system), but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Even though the OPPO Find X2 Pro is incredibly newer than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, it's way thicker and just a bit heavier.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a much better looking screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot better 1440 x 3168 resolution, a little bigger screen and a better pixel density.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much higher (4K) video resolution, a back facing camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution and a larger camera aperture. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 7 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.