Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31 has an overall score of 86.5, which is a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro's 83.1 general score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M31 has a newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10, providing the user a lot of extra features and performance enhancements. Galaxy M31 is a just a bit lighter device than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, but both of them have the same thickness.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M31, because it has a way brighter display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3168, a little bit bigger screen and a better count of pixels per screen inch. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy M31, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a little faster processor than Galaxy M31, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy M31's camera is just as good as OPPO Find X2 Pro's camera, because although the Galaxy M31 has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photos, a tinier sensor taking lower quality videos and photos and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 features a way better battery life than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 41% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.