Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Ocean | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31s is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, having a score of 88 against 83.1. Although the Samsung Galaxy M31s and the OPPO Find X2 Pro were released only 3 months apart, Samsung Galaxy M31s's construction is a little bit thicker but also a little lighter. Both devices we are comparing use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M31s has a more recent 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10 version, so it counts with a couple nice extra features.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy M31s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 Pro features a more vivid display than Galaxy M31s, because it has more pixels per display inch, a bit larger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3168.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. OPPO Find X2 Pro and Galaxy M31s count with extremely similar cameras, because although the Galaxy M31s has slower 30 fps video frame rates, a smaller back-facing camera sensor and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, it also counts with a camera in the back with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy M31s features a way better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4260mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.