Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Ocean | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a global score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2 Pro's global score of 83.1. Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a a little bit lighter cellphone than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, but both of them are 0.35inches thick. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit better performance than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch in the display, a quite bigger display and a slightly higher 1440 x 3168px resolution. OPPO Find X2 Pro has much more storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 4260mAh battery size. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and a way larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.