Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy S6 edge+, with an 83.1 score against 79.3. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has a newer 10 version and Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version. OPPO Find X2 Pro's design is noticeably newer than the Galaxy S6 edge+'s, although it's notably thicker and incredibly heavier.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a superior hardware performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores. OPPO Find X2 Pro and Galaxy S6 edge+ have incredibly similar displays, although the Galaxy S6 edge+ has a little lower screen pixels density, a little bit smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 2560 x 1440.
OPPO Find X2 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a way larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs, higher video frame rate, a bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited environments and a back facing camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.