Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Ceramic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 519 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4260mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, getting a overall score of 85.5 against 83.1. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a somewhat lighter phone than OPPO Find X2 Pro, but both of them are 0.35inches thick. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit better processor than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a much brighter display, a little larger display, a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3168. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a superior camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a back camera with much more mega pixels, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and videos and a lot larger sensor capturing lot higher quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.