Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Ocean | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X2's global score of 79.7. These phones work with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding OS features. LG V50 ThinQ is an older and just a little bit thicker cellphone than the OPPO Find X2, but LG was able to make it just a little bit lighter anyway.
OPPO Find X2 features a little faster processing unit than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a greater amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 counts with a little bit better screen than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a bit bigger screen.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much better storage for games and applications than OPPO Find X2, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X2 shoots much better photos and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the OPPO Find X2 also counts with a lot more megapixels camera and a way larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
OPPO Find X2 has just a bit better battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.