Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31 is just a bit better than the OPPO Find X2, getting an 86.5 score against 79.7. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Galaxy M31 has a more recent 11 version while OPPO Find X2 has Android 10, so it counts with a lot of extra features and improved performance. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the Galaxy M31 is a just a little heavier and thicker phone than the OPPO Find X2.
The OPPO Find X2 features a bit better CPU than Galaxy M31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has more RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 has a brighter screen than Galaxy M31, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels, much more brightness, a greater screen pixels density and a bit bigger display.
OPPO Find X2 features more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy M31, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a bit better camera than OPPO Find X2, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also counts with a camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution and a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy M31 has a way better battery performance than OPPO Find X2, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.