Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Ocean | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31s is better than OPPO Find X2, with a global score of 88 against 79.7. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy M31s has the newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 has Android 10 version. Even being the best cellphone we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy M31s's body is thicker and just a little heavier than OPPO Find X2.
OPPO Find X2 has a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because it has a little bit bigger display, a higher count of pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 3168 resolution. The Galaxy M31s features just a bit more memory for games and applications than OPPO Find X2, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The OPPO Find X2 features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M31s, and although they both have 8 cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a little bit better camera than OPPO Find X2, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also counts with a camera with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy M31s counts with a very superior battery life than OPPO Find X2, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.