Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Ocean | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 519 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a bit better than OPPO Find X2, getting an 87.1 score against 79.7. Even being the best device in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 is an older, somewhat thicker and a little bit heavier device than the OPPO Find X2. OPPO Find X2 has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note9, because it has a bit higher quantity of pixels per screen inch, a little larger display and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3168px.
The Galaxy Note9 counts with slightly more storage for games and applications than OPPO Find X2, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. The OPPO Find X2 has a bit superior processor than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
OPPO Find X2 features just a little better battery life than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 4200mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.