Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Ocean | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3168 x 1440 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 519 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2, with an 85.5 score against 79.7. Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is older and thicker than OPPO Find X2, it's construction is still just a little lighter. OPPO Find X2 counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has more RAM.
OPPO Find X2 features a brighter screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px, way more brightness, more pixels per inch of display and a little larger screen. OPPO Find X2 features a superior camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 also has a much larger back camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in low light situations and a lot higher 48 MP resolution camera.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much better storage to install games and applications than OPPO Find X2, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 256 GB. The OPPO Find X2 counts with a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 5% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.