Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting a general score of 81.6 against 74.1. Google Pixel 2's construction has the same thickness than OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it is lighter. The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a just a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger display and a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. OPPO Find X3 Lite and Google Pixel 2 have extremely similar storage to store more games and applications, both have equal internal storage.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4300mAh battery size against 2700mAh. OPPO Find X3 Lite captures better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a much more megapixels back camera and a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low light situations.
Google Pixel 2 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.