Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is a bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, having a global score of 81.3 against 74.1. Even though the Google Pixel XL is notably older and just a little bit thicker than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, it's design is still just a bit lighter. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with just a bit better screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a just a little worse number of pixels per inch in the screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a larger screen.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit faster processor than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4 more CPU cores and 4 GB more RAM memory. The Google Pixel XL counts with as much memory for applications, games, photos and videos as the OPPO Find X3 Lite one, both have the same internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a superior camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a bigger diafragm aperture and a back-facing camera with much more MP. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features better battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel XL costs a lot more money than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.