Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 is slightly better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, having a general score of 77 against 74.1. Despite of the fact LG V20 is extremely older and a little bit heavier than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, it's design is still just a little thinner. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a little better hardware performance than LG V20, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
OPPO Find X3 Lite features a bit better screen than LG V20, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite larger display. OPPO Find X3 Lite features a superior camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a bigger aperture.
The LG V20 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with longer battery life than LG V20, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V20 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.