Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 has an overall score of 79.1, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 score. The LG V30 body is just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it was released many years before. OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a little bit better screen than LG V30, because although it has a bit lower pixel amount per screen inch and a much lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
The LG V30 counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a little faster processing unit than LG V30, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a better camera than LG V30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing photographs in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite features greater battery duration than LG V30, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity.
LG V30 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.