Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, having an 83.7 score against 74.1. Although LG V50 ThinQ is better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, we must highlight that it is also an older, just a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker device. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite and the LG V50 ThinQ count with extremely similar displays, and although the LG V50 ThinQ has a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a greater pixels count per screen inch, they both have a same size screen. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better processor than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. OPPO Find X3 Lite features just a bit better battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity. OPPO Find X3 Lite captures much better videos and photos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a back camera with a way better 64 megapixels resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.