Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android |
| 2021-04-14 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 411 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's overall score of 74.1. The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a somewhat thicker and heavier cellphone than the OPPO Find X3 Lite. Samsung Galaxy A32 comes with Android operating system, and OPPO Find X3 Lite comes with Android 11 operating system.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has a much sharper display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a much better display pixels density. Galaxy A32 features a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a little better processing power than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X3 Lite captures clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a larger aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited environments and a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Galaxy A32 counts with improved battery lifetime than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 16 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.