Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is much better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, having a global score of 91.8 against 74.1. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 OS (operating system). Although it's the best cellphone we compare here, Galaxy A71 5G is an older, just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone than OPPO Find X3 Lite.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has 2 GB more RAM. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a just a bit better number of pixels in each screen inch.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing images and/or video in low-light situations, they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a 64 mega pixels resolution back camera and the same 30 fps video frame rate.
Galaxy A71 5G features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A71 5G also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with just a little better battery duration than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is also a bargain compared to others, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.