Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-04-14 | 2018-08-27 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A8 Star is much better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting an 82.1 score against 74.1. The Samsung Galaxy A8 Star body is a little thinner than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it is a little bit heavier and was released 3 years before. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11, giving you lots of additional features.
OPPO Find X3 Lite has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a little bit greater count of pixels per inch of display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit larger display. Galaxy A8 Star counts with more storage for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 400 GB.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a 16% bigger battery size. OPPO Find X3 Lite captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, and although they both have the same video quality, the same video frame rate and the same aperture, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a much better 64 MP resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.