Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 is much better than OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting an 84.9 score against 74.1. The Samsung Galaxy A80 design is older, somewhat thicker and way heavier than the OPPO Find X3 Lite. OPPO Find X3 Lite has just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a little greater display pixel density.
The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy A80. They have 8 CPU cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. OPPO Find X3 Lite and Galaxy A80 both feature really similar memory for applications and games, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Lite captures a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a back camera with much more mega pixels and a bigger aperture to capture better images in low light environments.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A80, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.