Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black and White |
| -- | Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is way better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 global score. Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android operating system, while OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 operating system. Despite being the best device in this comparison, we must note that it is also older, just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. OPPO Find X3 Lite has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also counts with a quite higher pixels quantity per inch in the display.
The Galaxy A90 5G has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G takes clearer pictures and videos than OPPO Find X3 Lite, although it has a lot lower resolution back-facing camera, a tinier camera aperture which is worse for taking photographs or videos in low light situations and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has just a bit longer battery lifetime than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 5% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.