Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-04-14 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a score of 81, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite's 74.1 global score. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version and OPPO Find X3 Lite has Android 11 version, so it provides the user some nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is an a lot older and a little bit heavier cellphone than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, but Samsung managed to build it thinner anyway.
OPPO Find X3 Lite features a bit faster processor than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a quite larger screen and a just a little higher screen pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a slightly bigger storage for apps and games than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 256 GB. The OPPO Find X3 Lite features a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
OPPO Find X3 Lite takes way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a back camera with a much higher 64 MP resolution, a larger aperture and a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.