Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-14 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.26 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Astral Blue, Galactic Silver and Starry Black | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 560.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s is better than the OPPO Find X3 Lite, getting an 83.3 score against 74.1. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Galaxy M30s body is older, somewhat thicker and just a little bit heavier than the OPPO Find X3 Lite. The OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM.
OPPO Find X3 Lite counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a same size display, the OPPO Find X3 Lite also has a little bit more pixels per screen inch and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy M30s has a camera that's very similar to OPPO Find X3 Lite's camera, although the Galaxy M30s has a camera in the back with way less mega-pixels, a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video and a worse 3840x2160 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M30s has a much longer battery duration than OPPO Find X3 Lite, because it has a 40 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.